Home      Synopsis of Case      Court Cases Overview      Press Releases      Selected Correspondence

Court Cases:     Keyter v. George W. Bush      Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller      Keyter v. Senator McCain
Keyter v. 230 Government Officers      Keyter v. John Ashcroft      Keyter v. Keyter
USA v. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller      USA v. 443 Known Insurgents      USA v. 535 Members of the 110th Congress

Synopsis of the Case - March 31, 2008

Introduction

There is a major seditious conspiracy afoot within federal and state government, and in the courts, to obstruct the administration of the laws, defeat the course of justice, provide protection to known criminals, and to deny constitutional rights to protection of the laws. As of March 31, 2008, fourteen thousand one hundred and sixty four (14,164) known conspirators were implicated in this pervasive insurrection against the laws of the United States - 14,110 government officers, and 54 others.

The seditious conspirators have engaged in or assisted and incited subversive acts against the laws of the United States by failing to enforce, administer, and execute the laws. The conspirators have illegally removed evidence of their crimes from the courts; have attempted to use force to prevent, hinder, and delay the execution of the laws; and have twice attempted to kidnap and murder me as Supreme Court litigant and key witness to their crimes. Evidence of stalking indicates that this murder plot is actively being pursued. The United States institutions of justice and law enforcement have provided no protection because these institutions are, perversely, led by the very ring-leaders of this criminal endeavor.

Officials from 620 pertinent institutions of government tasked with law and order have abrogated their duties and thwarted the normal course of justice in order to protect law-breaking government officers from prosecution. An intense group effort in the top structures of the Bush Administration, the U.S. Congress, the Governments of the 50 States, the US Armed Forces, and the Courts, has attempted to conceal the crimes. Their failure to act against the insurgency has furthered the objectives of the conspirators and made it possible for the criminal endeavor to proliferate. Officials from these institutions have thereby breached the statutes and implicated themselves as co-conspirators in the insurrection against the laws of the United States, and as accessories after the fact to the kidnap and murder attempts.

Exhaustive measures have been taken to instigate justice and restitution, and to animate the law enforcement and judicial process to deal with this deluge of lawlessness amongst officials, but to no avail. None of the crimes have been investigated or prosecuted. The criminal violations are ongoing, and as an ever widening circle of officials become implicated in the cover up of the crimes, the numbers keep escalating. This criminal misconduct by officials has had a harsh impact upon society and unleashed a definite brand of tyranny upon the populace.

To understand the motives of the conspirators in violating the laws and attempting to kidnap and murder, it is essential to understand the broader setting in which these crimes have been committed.

Milieu

The founding fathers of America have enshrined noble principles in the Constitution -principles of freedom, justice, and the protection of individual rights. However, in the application of these principles and in the administration of the laws something has gone dreadfully awry. The lofty principles established by the Constitution have been usurped by officials with more sinister intentions. The United States of today is not the benign society which the founding fathers aspired to create through the higher values enshrined in the Constitution.

Two sets of standards have developed in the execution of the laws - one set applicable to the general populace, the other applicable to those in authority. Officials in positions of authority who abuse their positions and the law may generally do so with impunity. This has become the norm and there is no effective antidote available to the common man against this phenomenon. The system of government and certain laws in fact protect such abusers from culpability. This further encourages immoral and corrupt behavior amongst officials.

Officials who are tasked with administering the laws simply fail to take action against offenders in their midst. This proves to be a most common and effective method to protect a law-breaking peer from prosecution. This collusion amongst officialdom to protect colleagues from criminal and civil accountability is widespread throughout all branches of government: executive, legislative, and law enforcement/judiciary. The profound malevolence permeates through every level of government: city, county, state, and federal. The phenomenon translates into a certain brand of tyranny - the tyranny of a democratically elected government wrought upon its own people.

On the face of it this indictment might appear implausible. However, the veracity thereof is amply substantiated by the facts elaborated in a 'Dossier of Crimes', and in thousands of pages of evidential documents surrounding the broader case. The dossier comprises some 2000 pages of prima facie evidence and describes the impunity with which 14,164 conspirators have committed innumerable crimes, and have attempted to kidnap and murder a witness to their crimes.

Development of the Case

Initial Crimes

Every citizen living in the United States has by law, amongst others, the following two inalienable rights - that of lawful ownership of property, and that of equal protection of the laws, viz. US Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1: "... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

Despite these Constitutional protections, my assets were seized and I was stripped of a sizeable portion of my income by illegal government action.

Exhaustive Measures

Since January 2002, exhaustive measures have been taken to seek justice and restitution for the initial crimes, and to animate the law enforcement process to deal with a deluge of subsequent crimes amongst officials, but to no avail. In my efforts I have to date made thousands of written requests to more than 14,000 officials - from the most junior police officer to the highest authorities in the land. With every letter I have thought: this one will reach a heart and change a mind. But I woefully underestimated the darkness I had to penetrate.

The numerous written requests for protection and enforcement of the laws were directed to officials from 620 different, but pertinent, institutions of government tasked with law and order. (Appendix 1). These institutions include state and federal police departments, state and federal prosecutors, state and federal judges, legislators, judiciary committees, judicial conduct commissions, ethics boards, bar associations, state and federal attorneys general, and state and federal executives.

Requests for protection and enforcement of the laws were also addressed to the courts. In all, 27 court cases have been filed in state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. (Appendix 2). In each case I sought two things: a) the redress of the illegal seizure of de jure property, and b) the protection of the law against ongoing harmful criminal acts. These rights are secured to every United States citizen, including me, through the promise of the 14th Amendment.

The exhaustive measures taken to secure justice are described in the 'Dossier of Crimes', described in the 120 proceedings of the 27 court cases mentioned, and in other related documents in the hands of various authorities.

Corruption in Government / Judiciary

Prima facie evidence of the crimes committed by government officers was provided to the authorities and to the courts. Each official to whom the crimes were presented had the capacity, the authority, and a statutory duty, to address the crimes. However, every official omitted to perform their legal duties to investigate and prosecute, or to initiate same. In every instance my appeals for justice and protection of the laws were rejected with callous indifference, in favor of a cover up of government and judicial wrongdoing and in protecting the law-breaking officials implicated from prosecution. In every instance my rights, ostensibly protected by the Constitution and the laws, were scorned and my appeals to the authorities were rejected with contempt - many times over. In every one of the 27 interrelated court cases (which addressed different groupings in the criminal conspiracy), the courts not only failed to deal with the deluge of crimes presented to the courts, but actively suppressed the shameful issue.

In this case the cover up of crimes committed by law-breaking officials is absolute. Yet, the case is not unique, but merely a reflection of what happens across the United States, day after day, in court upon court, and in administration upon administration - city, county, state, and federal. In practice, government officers who break the law at the expense of the common man are unassailable. However, providing protection to criminals is a crime, and failure to have them identified is a crime.

Misprision / Obstruction / Conspiracy

The statute on Misprision of Felony (18USC4), amongst many other statutes, obligates officials to deal with felonies and other crimes which have been brought to their attention. In this case, officials should either have initiated the investigations or prosecutions on their own volition, or alternatively, they should have passed the information on to somebody in authority who would have addressed the crimes. (28USC535). Each official involved failed to perform that legal duty and violated the statutes on misprision of felony, as well as the requirement to investigate crimes involving government officers.

By the same reasoning, each official obstructed and impeded the due and proper administration of the law and violated the statute on obstruction of justice. (18USC1505). Every official was thus a principal offender due to his own substantive violations of law. By their criminal conduct each official, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, assisted other offenders in order to hinder or prevent their apprehension, trial, and punishment, and became accessories after the fact to the crimes of the other offenders. (18USC3).

Each official also furthered the aims of the broad ranging conspiracy to commit offenses, and the conspiracy against rights, and joined in with the objectives to obstruct the course of justice. As a result, each official became a co-conspirator to the crimes of the other offenders. Thus a staggering number of crimes have been documented according to the dictates of the law.

Yet, the initial crimes cannot be disputed. The laws are clear and have not been obeyed. Unimpeachable evidence of numerous felonies is provided in the 'Dossier of Crimes'. For instance, burglary has been confessed to under oath by the perpetrator; perjury is clearly discernable in conflicting statements under oath; a judge acknowledges (in court transcripts) the illegal removal of crucial court evidence - tampering with evidence.

Other serious crimes associated with this criminal conspiracy include: Fraud; Theft; Official Misconduct; Rendering Criminal Assistance; Conspiracy against Rights; Conspiracy to Commit Offense; Tampering with a Witness; Retaliation against a Witness with intent to kill; and Attempted Kidnap with intent to kill.

Details and prima facie evidence of the crimes committed by the 14,164 conspirators, (provided in the 2000 pages of the 'Dossier of Crimes'), have been presented to government authorities and the courts on some 50 occasions. No investigations or prosecutions have been conducted on any of these known felonies. The undeniable evidence has also been presented to the US Supreme Court on 12 occasions, but on each occasion the conspirators removed those criminal dossiers from the Supreme Court Records.

Perversion of justice can have no clearer and more debased an example. The 14,110 officials involved in the criminal conspiracy hold pertinent positions in state and federal governments. Amongst state officials are police chiefs, prosecutors, attorneys general, secretaries of state, legislators, and governors. Also included are state judges from all levels of state courts. Amongst federal government officials involved in the criminal conspiracy are FBI agents, the US Attorney General and US Attorneys, federal judges including the Chief Justice, generals and admirals of the Armed Forces, and the Vice President and President of the United States.

The Role of the President of the United States

When all the available remedies had been exhausted and I nevertheless failed to animate the legal system to deal with the crimes, I addressed myself to President Bush with the request that he see to the faithful execution of the laws in terms of his constitutional duties, viz: "The President ... shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed". (US Constitution, Article II, Section 3).

The President was informed of the large scale criminal conspiracy involving government officials, and that their crimes had been suppressed. He was provided with all the necessary information in order to take appropriate action. (See 45 letters to President Bush to date). Despite his peremptory duties under the Constitution and the criminal statutes, and despite numerous requests, President Bush willfully failed to take any action at all, but instead elected to join in the cover up of the crimes. This conduct placed the President directly in breach of the criminal statutes, the Constitution, and the common law duties of every citizen.

As a consequence a civil suit was filed against President Bush for his violations of the criminal statutes and common law, and to seek a court order compelling him to obey the law and the Constitution. This suit met with further criminal behaviour in the Federal District Court in D.C. - committed by the President, by his counsel, and by the presiding judge in case no. 03-cv-2496. These crimes are fully described in the appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (case no. 04-5324). In their turn the Court of Appeal judges failed to deal with the crimes and joined with the endeavor by President Bush and other law-breaking officials to conceal the crimes, and in so doing violated the statutes themselves.

Hence an appeal was made to the United States Supreme Court for justice, for, chiseled upon the marble edifice of the Supreme Court are the compelling words: "Equal Justice under Law". Under this auspicious banner 3 cases, which pitted the common man against the might of a corrupt American establishment, were presented to the Supreme Court. Those cases are:
  1. Anthony P. Keyter vs. George W. Bush, Supreme Court Case No. 05-140.
  2. Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers, Supreme Court Case No. 06-284.
  3. Anthony P. Keyter vs. McCain et al., Supreme Court Case No. 06-1069
These cases addressed the criminal neglect of government officials to deal with the deluge of crime within their ranks.

Corruption in the United States Supreme Court

Unsurprisingly however, the criminal endeavor by politicians, judges, and officials, to obstruct the course of justice advanced uninterruptedly into the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court failed to address the corruption in the government and the courts, and failed to attend to the parcel of 1.6 million crimes placed before it in the 3 cases against government officials. In their turn, the Supreme Court Justices lent their considerable (but corrupt) power to advance the aims of the criminal conspirators to obstruct the administration of the laws and defeat the course of justice. All 3 cases were characterized by significant criminality in the court so as to protect President Bush and the other senior government officials from civil and criminal prosecution.

Fraudulent Judgments

In each instance the Certiorari petitions to the Supreme Court were fraudulently and illegally denied without the benefit of all the relevant documentation and without the Justices performing obligatory judicial duties to address the underlying crimes. A Mandamus petition was filed in the case against President Bush requesting a Supreme Court Order to command the President to obey the laws. The Mandamus petition was ostensibly deliberated, and then fraudulently denied by the Justices - yet all the copies of the petition had already been stolen from the courthouse within hours of being filed, and were never available for deliberation by the Justices.

Rendering Criminal Assistance

The failure of the Supreme Court Justices to act upon evidence of multiple felonies presented in court documents and the criminal dossiers, protected and rendered criminal assistance to known felons. The Justices thereby obstructed the due and proper administration of the laws and violated 18USC1505 and 18USC4. Urgent Motions for Injunction seeking court protection from ongoing crimes in each of the 3 related Supreme Court cases were not addressed. This neglect sanctioned further criminal misconduct by officials, and violated 18USC3.

Violation of Laws Disqualifying a Judge

Motions for recusal and/or disqualification of the Justices were submitted to the Supreme Court when it became clear that they were colluding in the criminal conspiracy underlying each of the 3 cases. However, the Justices failed to recuse themselves, acted under severe conflict of interest untenable in law, and rendered judgments to dismiss the very cases which implicated them in crime. The Justices thereby shielded themselves from investigation, impeachment, and prosecution. It must be noted that Chief Justice Roberts did in fact recuse himself from 2 of the deliberations, however, on other applicable occasions he did not. The laws governing the recusal of judges expressly prohibit acting under such conflict. The Justices violated 28USC144 and 28USC455.

Shielding of Criminal Offenders by Supreme Court Police

Criminal Complaints, and other unambiguous evidence regarding felonies associated with the 3 cases, were filed with the Supreme Court Police. A number of these felonies were committed in the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court Police failed to act against the offenders, instead providing a protective umbrella for ongoing lawlessness, e.g. theft of court record, intimidation, and retaliation against a witness.

Tampering with / Illegal removal of Court Evidence

In all 3 related Supreme Court cases, all incriminating evidence implicating the President and other senior government officials in crime were illegally removed from Supreme Court Records. Subsequent attempts to re-file the stolen documents repeatedly met with the same offense. In the civil case against President Bush, 41 out of 47 documents filed in the case were stolen from the court records. In the case against 230 Government Officers, 4 incriminating documents were corruptly and repetitively removed. In the case against Senator McCain, Vice President Cheney, Chief Justice Roberts, and other senior officials, 6 pertinent documents were corruptly removed. These documents were re-filed, and repeatedly removed. On 12 occasions the criminal dossiers and the evidence they contain were illegally removed from the Supreme Court Records. These criminal acts transpired with the full collaboration of the Supreme Court Justices, with the co-operation of the Clerk and his personnel, and under the protective umbrella of the Supreme Court Police. Evidence presented in the 'Dossier of Crimes', and correspondence with the court, attests to this fact. These acts of theft of record violated 18USC1506 on numerous counts.

Retaliation against a Witness

Because of my unrelenting persistence to find justice, the government conspirators resorted to witness-tampering (18USC1512) and retaliation against me (18USC1513). This was done with the clear intent to prevent my attendance in official court proceedings, and to prevent further testimony against the law-breaking government officers, including the ring-leaders: President Bush, Chief Justice Roberts, Attorney General Gonzales, and FBI Director Mueller. In a further display of abuse of power and of state machinery, President Bush ordered the illegal interception of all my communications in violation of the tenets of the Patriot Act. The Supreme Court willfully neglected to address the crimes and failed to protect a Supreme Court litigant from retaliation by government officials.

Attempted Kidnap and Murder

On February 9th, 2006 a 'Petition for Rehearing' was filed with the US Supreme Court in the case against President Bush (case no. 05-140), together with a Criminal Complaint which addressed the extensive theft of court records. These documents significantly increased the risk of public exposure and prosecution of President Bush and his co-conspirators.

Within 24 hours of these documents being filed in the US Supreme Court, President Bush and his agents initiated a criminal plot to retaliate against me with intent to kill me as primary witness to their crimes - in order to thwart the course of justice and administration of the laws. The execution of this plot commenced in the Supreme Court and unfolded through the offices of the White House, the Boeing Company, and the Federal Aviation Authority.

Under orders from the President, White House aids contacted my employer, the Boeing Company. In a mutually beneficial arrangement, officers of the Boeing Company immediately embarked upon an attempt to inveigle me to an area away from my normal workplace, there to unlawfully seize me - kidnap me - in collaboration with and in execution of the plot to murder me. Boeing was offered an attractive contract/compensation to facilitate this iniquitous conduct, and the Boeing Board acquiesced to the request. This act violated the statute 18USC1201.

The first attempt to kidnap and murder me (initiated by officers of the Boeing Company) failed, and resulted in further criminal charges being filed. A second attempt was undertaken through the Federal Aviation Authority in an effort to prevent information relating to these federal offenses from reaching law enforcement and the courts. The second kidnap attempt was also abortive, but these attempts succeeded in destroying my livelihood and 17-year career as Senior Instructor Pilot with the Boeing Company. Subsequent evidence of stalking indicates that the conspirators intend to consummate their sinister plot.

Details of the kidnap and murder plot are further described in the 'Dossier of Crimes' Volume 3 (State-supported Tyranny upon the Populace), in Chapter 1 and Chapters 41 - 44. The Boeing Company and FAA officers involved, and their co-conspirators, are listed in Chapter 3 of the dossier. A considerable amount of detail of events and evidence of the kidnap attempts is available to investigators. Audio tapes of conversations with Boeing managers and FAA officials clearly indicate the conclusions on intent, and reveal the involvement of Attorney General Gonzales and agents from his Justice Department.

The two foiled kidnap and murder attempts were respectively commanded, facilitated, and directed, by President Bush, Chief Justice Roberts, Attorney General Gonzales, and FBI Director Mueller. There is indeed a grim threat and a high likelihood of further retaliation against me on behalf of the seditious conspirators, including the likelihood of a break-in and theft of incriminating documents, or removal of incriminating evidence from my office with a phony search warrant corruptly obtained. Moreover, there are many other high profile and politically powerful officials amongst the conspirators. Their propensity to malice, and the absolute impunity with which they can and do violate the laws, is amply demonstrated in the 'Dossier of Crimes'. When the extent of their legal predicament is considered and evidence of stalking is taken into account, further attempts to eliminate me as witness are highly probable.

De Facto Impunity against Arrest

The kidnap and murder attempts have not been investigated or prosecuted - neither by the Department of Justice or the FBI, nor by or any other law enforcement agency, or state or federal court - despite having been provided with the information and numerous appeals. Exhaustive measures have thus failed to bring President Bush and his co-conspirators and agents to justice before the courts of the United States, and failed to secure protection against further attempts upon my life. These malevolent officials, in their high office, have been granted de facto 'impunity' against arrest for attempted murder and numerous other serious felonies. The common man, and the public at large, effectively has no practical antidote or protection against such assault upon the public peace and safety by officials in high positions.

Seditious Conspiracy

United States law dictates that if two or more persons conspire to oppose by force the authority of the United States, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, they are in violation of the statute on Seditious Conspiracy (18USC2384).

None of the participants acted alone in the criminal activities described herewith. The complicity (18USC2), and/or accessory role (18USC3), of each of the known criminal conspirators in the attempted kidnap and murder of a key witness to their crimes, is evident from their failure of legal obligation to address that crime - either as responsible United States citizens (18USC4), or as officials pursuant their oath of office and their specific duties associated with their position of authority under the United States.

The criminal acts described above furthered the common aims of, and were of mutual benefit to, all known conspirators. The illegal removal of the criminal dossiers and other incriminating evidence from the Supreme Court Record suppressed information of the crimes of all the conspirators. The illegal removal of the mandamus petition in the Bush Supreme Court case saved all the conspirators from a court order enforcing criminal investigation and resultant prosecution. The plot to kidnap and murder me, if it had succeeded, would have wiped all court proceedings against the conspirators clean off the slates. It is the combined action by conspirators that has served to defeat the course of justice so absolutely - one conspirator or group performing one part of the criminal act, another, the other part of the act. For instance: one group of conspirators committing the crime of retaliation against a witness with intent to murder, the others illegally protecting those law-breaking colleagues by failing to prosecute the crime. (See 18USC371).

This cooperative endeavor amongst the conspirators to commit offenses against the United States, or to assist in the commission thereof, was amply demonstrated during the period March 13 to 25, 2006. I was informed that meetings were held between representatives of the different groupings of conspirators, under the auspices of US Attorney General Gonzales, to plot their evasion of criminal culpability for crimes committed, to render criminal assistance to one another, and to plot further retaliatory action against me.

To date, 14,110 government officers and 54 others have conspired to, by force, prevent, hinder, and delay the execution of the laws of the United States, in violation of the law prohibiting seditious conspiracy, 18USC2384.

Every conspirator violated at least 16 statutes as principal offender. Every conspirator is also culpable under law, of the offenses of every other conspirator. The number of crimes committed in this seditious conspiracy is thus 16 x 14,164 x 14,164 = 3.2 billion crimes. These are sobering statistics, and represent a powerful insurrection against the laws of the United States.

Insurrection against the Laws

The law dictates that, whoever incites, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States, or the laws thereof, or gives aid and comfort thereto, is in violation of the statute on Rebellion or Insurrection (18USC2383), and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. At the time of writing, 14,110 state and federal officials have breached this statute; yet they illegally remain in their positions of power from whence they continue to conspire against the United States and its laws.

The Role of the Congress

Amongst my thousands of written appeals for justice are numerous appeals to every one of the 535 Members of the 110th Congress, individually, to address the criminal conspiracy within the government. In addition, the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, the Senate Committee on Government Affairs, the House Committee on Government Reform, the Senate President and the Speaker of the House, all have been requested through multiple letters to take action pursuant congressional oversight jurisdiction over the executive and judiciary. To no avail. Instead of addressing the crimes detailed in the 'Dossier of Crimes' and tackling the corruption in the courts, the committees and Congressmen shunned the requests and willfully failed to perform their critical oversight duties. With callous indifference they sanctioned the criminal activities of their peers. Amongst the Congressmen who have failed to act are the top Presidential candidates of the 2008 elections, thus guaranteeing continuity of the immorality and criminality within the United States Government.

The Role of the President's Cabinet

The entire United States 'Executive', including every member of the President's Cabinet, has been informed of the seditious conspiracy. Every executive member has been provided with prima facie evidence thereof, and has been requested to take action against the subversion and crime. Every executive member has a duty to act, has taken an oath to perform that duty, and to defend the nation against its enemies, foreign or domestic. And every executive member has instead chosen to provide aid and comfort to known insurgents.

The Role of the Justice Department and FBI

Since January 27, 2003, the United States Department of Justice, its Attorney Generals and US Attorneys, have step by step been kept informed of the development of this pervasive insurrection against the laws, via some 274 letters and several filings of the 'Dossier of Crimes'. The noteworthy response of the Department of Justice was to dispatch its FBI agents in February 2006, to co-ordinate my kidnap and murder through surrogates at the Boeing Company and the FAA. When those attempts failed, the Department of Justice held meetings with all interested parties to plot their next malicious steps to thwart the administration of the laws.

The Role of State Governments and Judiciary of the 50 States

The 50 States of the United States have been fully informed of the insurrection and sedition through their governors, attorneys general, police chiefs, legislators, and the judges of three levels of state courts. The state governments and judiciary were provided with evidence of the crimes and were similarly requested to use their authority under law to take appropriate action against the subversion. No action has been forthcoming from any of the state governments or courts to address the torrent of crime. The states have instead provided safe haven and passage to the insurgents - some of them resident in their state.

The Role of the United States Armed Forces

Given the extent of the insurrection within the government, and considering the powerful obstruction to the administration and execution of the laws exercised by the insurgents, the 5 Joint Chiefs of Staff and 52 other admirals and generals of the United States Armed Forces were informed of the sedition, and were requested to address the insurrection against the laws.

The United States Armed Forces have a duty prescribed by law, and its senior officers have taken an oath, to defend the country against its enemies, foreign or domestic. Yet, amongst the nation's top military commanders, amongst 57 generals and admirals who are fully informed of the insurrection, no one has dared to break ranks and address the sedition; no one has shown the fortitude or rectitude to perform their clearly defined military duty; and not one has honored his oath to defend the nation against its domestic enemies in this case. Not one. Every one of the 57 generals and admirals has actively assisted and engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States, and the laws thereof, and has given aid and comfort thereto.

Incestuous Relationship within Government

Thus the courts have illegally protected President Bush and his co-conspirators from culpability for crimes committed, including the crime of conspiracy to kidnap and murder. Congress has consecutively protected the President and corrupt judges from impeachment and prosecution. In their turn, the Congressmen enjoy the protection of the President and the courts from culpability for their failure of crucial duty to the people and to the state. One dirty hand washing the other. Providing a protective umbrella over this lawlessness are the generals and admirals of the Armed Forces of the United States.

The evidence to hand vividly exposes the incestuous relationship between the three branches of United States Government. This undesirable closed loop association, which saturates all levels of the establishment, has fostered mutual assistance and incitement to engage in rebellion and insurrection against the laws of the United States, and has provided aid and comfort to insurgents.

Treason against the United States

Each one of the 14,110 government officials involved in this insurrection against the laws of the United States, owes allegiance to the United States, and has taken an oath before God and the nation to avow that allegiance. Each of the government officials involved has an individual and undivided collective duty to defend the United States against its enemies, foreign or domestic. Each government official involved has willfully failed to defend the United States and its people against insurgents from within, who are bent on rebellion against the laws of the country. Each has instead given aid and comfort to the insurrection against the laws, and provided protection to known criminals. And each government officer so engaged has committed an unmitigated act of treason against the United States.

For, the law unambiguously states that whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or, adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States (18USC2381).

The Evidence

Three primary sources of information provide strong evidence of the crimes committed by the 14,164 known insurgents: a) The 'Dossier of Crimes'; b) Court proceedings in 27 court cases; and c) Correspondence with officials.

The Dossier of Crimes

Crimes committed by each of the conspirators, and of groups of conspirators, are meticulously documented, and prima facie evidence is provided in some 2000 pages of the 'Dossier of Crimes'. The dossier was first compiled on January 17, 2003, and has been continuously updated over the years since then. The latest revision of the dossier available to investigators and prosecutors is dated March 31, 2008.

Court Proceedings

Twenty seven court cases sought in vain to address different aspects and groupings of the criminal conspiracy. (Appendix 2). In every one of the 27 interrelated court cases, the courts not only failed to deal with the deluge of crimes presented to the court, but actively suppressed the shameful issue. Corrupt state and federal judges lent their full support to the government conspirators, joined forces with their aims to obstruct the course of justice, and denied due process of law in every conceivable way in all 27 court cases.

Court documents filed in the 120 corrupt proceedings of those cases provide unmistakable evidence of the subversive activities of law-breaking judicial officers. In many instances documents have been illegally removed from court records by the conspirators. However, those documents are available to investigators directly from the writer.

Written Appeals for Justice

Correspondence with officials - informing them of the criminal conspiracy against the laws and appealing for the enforcement, administration, and execution of the laws upon the conspirators - provide further clear evidence of the role of government officials in the seditious conspiracy and kidnap and murder attempts.

Summary

There remains in society today a parcel of more than 1.6 million crimes (and possibly multiples of this figure) perpetrated by high officials of the United States government that has yet to be investigated and prosecuted. A virulent seditious conspiracy, and a powerful insurrection against the laws of the United States, has ensued in the upper echelons of government to conceal these crimes and shield the perpetrators from prosecution.

To date, 14,110 officials from 620 separate government institutions tasked with law and order, and 54 others, have co-operated to defeat the course of justice and to provide 'impunity' to common criminals and prospective kidnappers and murderers in their midst. Law enforcement institutions and the courts have willfully turned a blind eye to these nefarious and felonious activities.

Originating in the courts in January 2002, the ever increasing deluge of crime, committed by government officials against the people of the United States, has yet to be terminated. The seditious conspirators illegally remain in their positions from whence they abuse government power to pursue their criminal endeavors. Moreover, they perpetrate their criminal deeds with the full support and participation of key government institutions: the White House and the Cabinet; the Department of Justice and the FBI; the US Congress; the Courts; the 50 State Governments; and the Armed Forces of the United States.

Conclusion

Aptly it has been stated, that "despotism sits nowhere so secure as under the effigy and ensigns of freedom". (Walter Savage Landor, 1775-1864). There can be no more perverse an example of state-supported tyranny upon an outwardly 'free society' than is presented by this case - and indeed in a country which is vociferous about human rights. The notion of 'freedom and justice' in America today does not reflect harsher realities. As there exists no viable restraining mechanism to curtail the abuses of power, in spite of the tenets of the Constitution, unbridled oppression is frequently inflicted upon the common man - as in this case. Given these circumstances, can one in truth claim that there is any difference between the United States of today and pre-war Iraq, Brezhnev's Russia, or Hitler's Germany?

The degeneracy in the institutions of United States government stand deeply exposed in this case - a governmental and judicial system corrupt to the core, where even the most moral who enter are besmirched by the system. A nation can have no greater shame than to have the custodians of its morals fall foul of the very principles they are the custodians of. As long as we give away our power to leaders who sway public opinion by the dexterity of their tongues, and not with the sincerity of their hearts, we will suffer the consequences of this misdirection. Should this anarchy in the government not be arrested and reversed, and should government officials be allowed to continue unchecked to fuel this debauchery, it will entrench repressive government and inflict untold suffering upon the citizens of tomorrow.

Yet, a rare opportunity presents itself in this debacle that faces the nation. If we can face the lessons of the present; understand their nature and negative ramifications for future generations; if we rectify our errors and the fatal flaws in our system of government, then we will sow the seeds of a brighter tomorrow. And if we inculcate in public servants the attributes of responsibility, true service, care, and respect - without selfish ambition, malice, dirty political maneuvering, and the iniquitous protection of malfeasant colleagues - then the seeds of a benevolent society, truly free from tyranny, will have been planted. Then can we usher in an era of improved human relations; of a society that will lead the world, not by sham and showmanship, nor by force, but by superlative example. That will be a legacy worthy of future generations.

But I do question in my mind: 'when shall arise one from the heart of this nation, enlightened and courageous, who will take on the prosecution of this wave of crime amongst officials; and when shall arise a political leader who has the vision to see that the legal system and governmental system of the United States is deeply flawed and in need of a profound overhaul?'

When such one arises, I shall say my task is done.

Anthony P. Keyter
April 21, 2008.




Appendix 1

List of Institutions that Failed
March 31, 2008

As of March 31, 2008, fourteen thousand one hundred and ten (14,110) government officers from 620 state and federal government institutions have been approached, and have failed, to address the 'Insurrection against the Laws' and 'Seditious Conspiracy' within the government and the courts of the United States:
Number of Institutions
US Presidency1
US Cabinet1
US Department of Justice: Civil Rights Division, Criminal Division, AG Office3
US Attorneys90
US State Department1
US Police: US Marshals, Secret Service, Supreme Court Police, FBI4
US Senate, Committees on Judiciary, Homeland Security & Govt. Affairs3
US House, Committees on Judiciary, Government Oversight 3
US Armed Forces1
US District Courts51
US Appeals Courts: DC Circuit, Fed. Circuit, 9th Circuit, 10th Circuit4
US Supreme Court1
State Governors50
State Cabinet/Executive50
State Attorneys General50
State Senate50
State House of Representatives50
State Police/Patrol50
State Superior Courts54
State Appeals Courts35
State Supreme Courts50
State Committees: Ethics, Judicial Conduct, Gender and Justice3
State Bar Associations2
County Sheriffs2
County Prosecutors2
County Councils2
County Ethics Committee1
City Police2
City Prosecutors2
City Councils2
Total Number of Institutions620
Appendix 2

Court Cases

The following twenty five federal and state court cases address diverse aspects of the criminal conspiracy within the courts and the government of the United States:
    United States vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales, Mueller
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 08-cr-00085-ZLW
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, Case # 08-1064

    United States vs. 443 Known Insurgents
  3. U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 08-cr-00086-ZLW
  4. U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, Case # 08-1063

    United States vs. 535 Members of the 110th Congress
  5. U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 08-cr-00087-ZLW
  6. U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, Case # 08-1061

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales, Mueller
  7. U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Case # 1: 08cv97

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. United States of America
  8. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case # 3: 08cv260

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. George W. Bush
  9. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, Case # 03-cv-2496 (EGS)
  10. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case # 04- 5324
  11. U.S. Supreme Court, Case # 05-140

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. Senator John McCain, et al
  12. U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CV05-01923- PHX-DGC
  13. U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Case # 06-15253
  14. U.S. Supreme Court, Case # 06-1069

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers
  15. U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, Case # 3: 04cv5867
  16. U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Case # 05- 35717
  17. US Supreme Court, Case # 06-284.

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. John Ashcroft, et al.
  18. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case # 04-5392

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. Vice President Dick Cheney, et al.
  19. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case # 04-5365

    Anthony P. Keyter vs. Maureen E. Keyter
  20. Washington State Superior Court, Case # 00-3-02932-1
  21. Washington State Superior Court, Case # 04-2-13977-1
  22. Washington State Court of Appeals, Case # 2737-6-II
  23. Washington State Supreme Court, Case # 76972-9
  24. Washington State Supreme Court, Case # 76956-7
  25. US Supreme Court, Case # not assigned.