Anthony P. Keyter vs. Senator McCain, et al.

Home Synopsis of Case Court Cases Overview Press Releases Selected Correspondence

Court Cases:

Keyter v. George W. Bush      Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller      Keyter v. Senator McCain
Keyter v. 230 Government Officers      Keyter v. John Ashcroft      Keyter v. Keyter
USA v. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller      USA v. 443 Known Insurgents      USA v. 535 Members of the 110th Congress

A civil suit for damages was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against US Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl. (Case # CV05-01923-PHX-DGC). Twenty nine Joinders were added to this case as defendants and include Vice President Cheney, Chief Justice Roberts, Federal Appeals Court Judges, the present and former Attorney General and several additional Department of Justice officials. The case arises out of the willful failure by the defendants of their moral, common law, and statutory duties sprouting from their knowledge of felonies committed by high government officials acting in a seditious conspiracy. Their failure aided and abetted the conspirators to escape justice and encouraged the continuance of their criminal endeavor, causing me, Anthony Keyter, further harm and loss. The case progressed from the Arizona District Court through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to the United States Supreme Court.

The defendants were advised of, and presented with, the details of a major criminal conspiracy within the government to obstruct the course of justice and to provide protection to known criminals. The defendants were approached to deal with this insidious conspiracy in their professional capacity as persons in authority under the United States, as well as in their private capacity as persons of esteemed status in American society. The citizenry of this country expects its leaders to incisively deal with any corruption of wholesome and ethical governance. This demand by the public is so compelling that it is entrenched in the statutes and in common law. The criminal statutes command the defendants to act. Amongst others, statute 18 USC 4 demands that whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, must act upon it or make it known to some judge. This duty to deal with known felonies is required of the defendants in both their official and private capacities.

The defendants willfully failed their moral, common law, and statutory duties regarding the felonies of high government officials presented to them. The defendants failed both their professional duties to the people of this nation, and their personal duties to society demanded by the law. Their failure aided and abetted the conspirators and encouraged the continuance of the insurrection against the laws, causing me injury. This injury gave rise to the filing of a civil suit for damages.

In a ruling aimed at protecting the defendants from civil and criminal prosecution, the District Court judge irregularly:

An appeal was lodged with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. (See Appeal Brief). Further corruption in the Appeals Court led to the upholding of the illegal District Court Judgment, and a petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed to seek justice in the US Supreme Court (See Certiorari). The prospects for this case in the US Supreme Court were considered in the Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the Justices of the Supreme Court. (See Mandamus Petition).

As anticipated, the Supreme Court Justices joined with the corruption associated with the case. The Justices failed to recuse themselves (with the exception of the Chief Justice); they illegally removed all evidence implicating themselves and the defendants in wrongdoing from the Supreme Court Records; and they fraudulently and unlawfully dismissed the case on April 13, 2007. Pursuant the United States Constitution, Article III, Section 1, the Supreme Court Justices - who are not in 'good behavior' - had no legal standing to decide on the Certiorari petition, nor to decide any other issue concerning this case, or any other case for that matter. (See Petition for Rehearing).