|
|
Court Case Anthony P. Keyter vs. Maureen E. Keyter Synopsis of the Case On November 29, 2004, a Complaint was filed in the Superior Court of Washington State in a civil claim for damages against Respondent, Maureen Keyter. The Respondent had committed criminal and common law violations of burglary, perjury, fraud, theft, and conspiracy with others against rights, which violations caused harm and loss. Amongst the co-conspirators in the criminal endeavor was State Appeals Court Judge Marywave Van Deren. The crimes committed by the Respondent formed the substrata of this civil claim, and a Motion for a Restraining Order was simultaneously filed against her. In violation of court rules, the presiding judge dismissed the crimes without addressing them, and took no action on the motion to restrain the Respondent. This rendering of criminal assistance by the judge to the Respondent, allowed the Respondent to flee the country shortly thereafter; to escape liability for crimes committed; and, to escape civil restitution for those crimes and their corresponding common law violations. An appeal was filed on January 6, 2005 in the Washington State Court of Appeals. Appeals Court Judges were notified of the serious crimes that had not been investigated or prosecuted, and were requested to tend to the crimes according to their judicial duties and the court rules. However, the judges chose to violate their duties to the state and acted instead to protect the conspirators from prosecution, presumably since Judge Van Deren, who was implicated, was a colleague on the Bench. The Washington State Court of Appeals dismissed the case in contravention of several laws and court rules. Recourse to the Washington State Supreme Court was not possible as there was entirely no prospect of a fair hearing in that court. The State Supreme Court Justices had earlier malevolently repudiated the conspiracy by state officers underlying this civil case, without investigation into any of the crimes. Accordingly, an appeal to the United States Supreme Court was filed in January, 2006. The Petition for Certiorari was accompanied by the 'Dossier of Crimes' which document described to the Supreme Court crimes committed by numerous high level officials acting in conspiracy with Maureen Keyter and Judge Van Deren. On 5 previous occasions in another case (Anthony P. Keyter vs. George W. Bush, case no. 05-140), the Clerk of the Court, Mr. Suter, illegally removed copies of the same dossier from the court record. Consistent with that action, Mr. Suter refused to file the certiorari and supporting criminal dossier on false and fraudulent grounds. No amount of effort has been successful to get this case filed in the Supreme Court - a simple matter of obstruction of justice by the clerk of the Supreme Court. Associated Cases
Selected Court Documents 1. Petition for Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.
|
