INFORMATION RELEASE

February 16, 2006

CORRUPTION IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

Petitions for writs of certiorari and mandamus were filed against President Bush in the United States Supreme Court case: Anthony P. Keyter vs. President George W. Bush, No. 05-140. The petitions have been denied, but the case has been characterized by significant corruption in the Supreme Court to protect President Bush from civil and criminal prosecution. As a result of the corruption, a 'Petition for Rehearing' of the two writs has been filed with the Supreme Court on February 9^th, 2006. The rehearing document (enclosed herewith) contains further information and evidence of the corruption.

Tampering with / Illegal removal of Court Evidence

White House aids have feloniously conspired with court officials to tamper with court evidence and to illegally remove incriminating documents from the Supreme Court Records in the above case. Thirty seven (37) documents were filed by the Petitioner in the case against the President, but only 4 appear on the Court Record. None of the remaining documents were presented to the Justices for their deliberations - causing their rulings (rejecting the petitions) to be flawed and defective. These acts of theft of record violated 18 USC § 1506 on 33 counts.

Fraud /denial of due process

The Supreme Court was petitioned to issue an order (mandamus) commanding President Bush to perform his peremptory statutory duties with regard to a large parcel of crimes which have been covered up by officials. Amongst the perpetrators was Justice Roberts. Chief Justice Roberts made a ruling on the mandamus without sight of, or any deliberation upon, the petition document - it had been illegally removed from court within hours of filing and was not available for study or deliberation. This constitutes fraud and denial of due process, in violation of the United States Constitution.

Violation of laws disqualifying a judge

A motion to disqualify Justice Roberts from the case against the President was submitted to the Supreme Court since he was implicated in the corruption during the progress of the case through the Court of Appeals. However, Justice Roberts failed to recuse himself, acted under severe conflict of interest untenable in law, and rendered a judgment dismissing a case which implicates him in crime - thereby shielding himself from investigation, impeachment, and prosecution. Acting under such conflict is expressly prohibited by the laws governing the recusal of a judge. Justice Roberts violated 28 USC§ 144 and 28 USC§ 455.

 

Rendering Criminal Assistance

The Supreme Court had been provided with dossiers containing some 1400 pages of prima facie evidence of serious and multiple felonies perpetrated by numerous government officials, and the Court was requested to act thereupon. The felonies were committed in and underlying the case: Anthony P. Keyter vs. President George W. Bush. The felonies have been covered up by the President. However, the dossiers were illegally removed from the court by the clerks without the Justices acting upon the crimes. By their action the clerks provided protection, and rendered criminal assistance, to known felons, thereby obstructing the due and proper administration of the laws and violating 18 USC§1505 and 18 USC §4.

Criminal charges filed against Supreme Court Officials

The Supreme Court Police have been informed of these and other criminal irregularities. Criminal charges have been filed with Magistrate Judge Focciola of the U.S. District Court (D.C.) against several officials of the Supreme Court, amongst them: The Clerk of the Court, Mr. William Suter; The Deputy Clerk of the Court, Mr. Christopher Vasil; Clerk's Assistants Ms. Gail Johnson, Ms. Lynn Holtz and Mr. Atkins.

Further details regarding the corruption in government and in the court may be obtained from the writer or from the website: www anthonypeterkeyter.com

 

 

Statement Released By:

Anthony P. Keyter

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________