|
|
June 2, 2008 Description
Introduction In an orgy of lawlessness in the State and Federal Governments, 14,110 politicians, officials, and judges, have embarked upon a major seditious conspiracy to obstruct the administration of the laws, defeat the course of justice, provide protection to known criminals, and to deny the Constitutional rights to due process and protection of the laws. The crimes caused me, Anthony Keyter, harm and loss and accordingly, as they developed, they were reported, first to state officials and later to federal officials. However, every official has assiduously covered up the multiple felonies by their lawbreaking colleagues - thereby violating the criminal statutes themselves. Providing protection to a criminal is a crime, and failure to have a criminal identified is a crime. (Statutes 18USC3, 18USC4, 28USC535, and 18USC1505 amongst others). Redress in the Courts Protection against the criminal acts of malfeasant officials, and redress for the harm and loss caused by their malevolent actions (or their failure to act where action was due), has in vain been sought in 27 state and federal court cases: 6 criminal cases, and 21 civil cases. Each court case addressed different aspects of the insurrection, and different groupings amongst the seditious conspirators. Every case has been corruptly and illegally dismissed, or denied, without tending to the deluge of crimes filed in the cases. Criminal Cases The United States of America opened 3 related criminal cases to address, in part only, some of the crimes of some of the conspirators. The cases were summarily and corruptly dismissed from the United States District Court. Three corresponding appeal cases have been filed and at the time of writing are still to be heard. A 'joinder motion' was filed to consolidate the cases into one large case addressing all crimes associated with the insurrection, and to include all 14,164 seditious conspirators. Philosophy behind Civil Suits As a general principle, every act or omission negligently or willfully perpetrated which harms another person, constitutes a cause of action in a tort law claim for damages. It follows then that every criminal act or omission which harms another, also gives rise to a civil claim for damages, as the criminal statutes merely reflect societal norms, common law principles and responsibilities. Accordingly, as a result of the failure of the criminal justice system to act against law-breaking officials, described above, civil suits for damages were filed against malfeasant officials (and others) who, through their acts/omissions, breached the criminal statutes and thereby caused me harm and loss. Nineteen (19) actions have been pursued through various courts viz: state superior courts, a state appeals court, and a state supreme court; federal district courts, federal appeal courts, and the US Supreme Court. Details thereof and links to these cases can be found on this page. The civil courts have ruled on some 114 proceedings, that is, petitions, motions, injunctions, appeals, certioraris, etc. Crime in the Court In their efforts to counteract and nullify the court cases and to escape civil and criminal liability, the officials/defendants committed further crimes in court. The officials/defendants embarked upon tampering with and theft of court records and incriminating evidence, conspiracy with judges to manipulate court judgments, and a path of malicious intimidation and retaliation against me as primary witness to the crimes of the officials. The 'Dossier of Crimes', which describes and provides prima facie evidence of the crimes of the 14,464 conspirators (of whom 14,110 are officials), have illegally been removed from several Court Records and from all 4 cases filed with the US Supreme Court. Numerous judges are directly involved in the criminality in the courts - including the Chief Justice of the United States, Justice John G. Roberts. Corruption by the Judges In the 120 civil and criminal proceedings thus far in the courts, not one judicial decision showed a semblance of justice, not one decision followed the law. In each case corrupt and politically motivated judges joined forces with the seditious conspirators and have, in violation of the law, dismissed the cases before trial in order to protect lawbreaking government officials. By way of example, judges who became personally implicated in the case, failed to recuse themselves when circumstances dictated that they do so, thereby violating the laws 28USC144 and 28 USC 455. Judges fraudulently reconstructed the 'facts' in their findings in order to deliver ostensibly respectable judgments, dismissing the cases as 'frivolous', or having no 'jurisdiction', or 'no cause of action'. In the case Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers for instance, presiding district court judge, Charles Lovell, made 47 fraudulent misrepresentations in his ruling to justify dismissing the case. (See details in the links to the case below). In the cases against President Bush, the 230 Government Officers, and Senator McCain et al., public prosecutors were compelled by law to prosecute the defendants for crimes committed, yet acted as Defense Counsel for the malfeasant officers in the civil suits which were based on those very same crimes - a conflict untenable in law. Furthermore, every one of the judges implicated failed to address the criminal offenses underlying the civil suits, as well as the offences committed in the courts. Title 18 USC § 3041 of the United States Code empowers a judge to act under circumstances where a Complaint, or an affidavit such as the 'Dossier of Crimes', provides probable cause of offenses. Every one of the judges had the power to act and had cognizance of the offenses committed by the conspirators/defendants. Title 18 USC 4 obligates the judges, having knowledge of felonies committed, to act appropriately and 'as soon as possible' regarding those felonies. Rules 4 & 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide regulation for the actions of a judge in this situation. Clear and unambiguous probable cause existed for most of the judges to arrest the defendants in accordance with Federal Court Rules. Yet no action was forthcoming. Every one of the judges criminally neglected his/her statutory duties to administer justice and instead protected the conspirators/defendants and concealed their crimes.
Judge's Motives One may well ask why judges would deny the request for an order compelling officials/defendants to obey the law and to execute their statutory duty regarding the crimes presented to them. In the context of the broader case the reason is very clear: to obstruct the investigation and prosecution of multiple felonies committed by high officials of government; to protect those lawbreaking officials from civil and criminal prosecution. One may ask how could so many of our judges participate in this corrupt endeavor and criminal conspiracy? There is obviously no moral perfection in a man or woman merely because he/she has assumed the mantle of 'judge'. It can also not be said that our judges are good (moral) and pure, and that in their 'untainted' minds will be found neither corruption nor defilement nor malignant bent. No, our judges merely reflect the prevailing consciousness of today's society - its scruples and its ills, which ills are so sadly demonstrated in this case. Each one of 14,164 officials whom I have approached to provide me protection of the laws, has instead illegally protected lawbreaking officials, and rendered assistance to them to escape criminal culpability. Each one the judges directly involved in this case has moved to shield the officials from criminal investigation and prosecution - in flagrant violation of their oaths and the laws on insurrection and treason. From an assessment of the facts of the case, a reasonable mind can come to no other conclusion than that the corruption demonstrated in this case is not unique, but merely a reflection of endemic corruption throughout all levels of government and the courts across the United States. The paradigm presented here demonstrates that in practice the protection of law-breaking officials by colleagues and by the courts is absolute; that government officers who break the law at the expense of the common man are unassailable; that America's 'Constitutional Rights' and protections which are so proudly touted to a cynical world, are in fact most arbitrarily applied by our courts - the US Supreme Court included. The abuse of the common man by those who hold positions of power and authority can, without any fear of contradiction, be termed a 'tyranny' upon the populace of the United States - the facts of this case irrefutably attest thereto. The subversion, treason and lawlessness in government and in the courts, is amply demonstrated and documented in the following 27 court actions, details of which may be accessed through the links below: Anthony P. Keyter vs. George W. Bush
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Senator John McCain et al
Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers
Anthony P. Keyter vs. John Ashcroft, et al.
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Vice President Dick Cheney, et al.
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Maureen E. Keyter
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales, Mueller
Anthony P. Keyter vs. United States of America
United States of America vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales, Mueller
United States of America vs. 443 Known Insurgents
United States of America vs. 535 Members of the 110th Congress
United States vs 14,164 Seditious Conspirators
Anthony P. Keyter vs Haggerty, et al
|
