|
INFORMATION RELEASE
August 30, 2005
SENATE PREDICAMENT RE JUDGE ROBERTS
Enclosed find information which reveals the dilemma facing the Senate in confirming Judge John G. Roberts as an Associate Justice to the Supreme Court.
The Senate has been advised that criminal charges have been lodged against Judge Roberts with Attorney General Gonzales. The charges stem from the Judge's malfeasant role in protecting President Bush in the Court of Appeals (D.C.), case no. 04-5324. That case in now in the US Supreme Court, case no. 05-140.
Judge Roberts is also embroiled as a defendant in a civil claim for damages premised on those same crimes. Several other senior Bush Administration officials are also joined in that same case. See Keyter vs. Senator McCain, et al, Arizona District Court, case no. CIV-05-1923-PHX-DGC.
The veracity of these facts can be confirmed by Senator Specter, Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary; from the court records in the above cases; or from the writer.
For your information the following documents are enclosed:
1. Copies of letters addressed to members of the Senate dated August 30, 2005 and August 5, 2005.
2. A copy of the criminal charges filed against Judge Roberts with Attorney General Gonzales, and receipt confirmation thereof by the Department of Justice.
Statement released by:
Anthony P. Keyter
Enclosure 1:
Anthony Keyter
[Address]
August 30, 2005
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC. 20510
Dear Senators,
Judicial Record: Supreme Court Nominee - Judge John G. Roberts
On August 5, 2005, I provided you with certain facts and references to the nefarious judicial record of Supreme Court nominee, Judge John G. Roberts. As that record countermands the nomination of the Judge, I requested that you acknowledge receipt of my letter lest the Senate confirm the nomination without the benefit of that pertinent information. To date I have not received this confirmation. For your information I briefly summarize that record herewith:
1. During March 2005, Judge Roberts, acting in the United States Court of Appeals, was presented with a dossier of crimes committed by 230 officials of government, which crimes had neither been investigated nor prosecuted by the authorities. John Roberts abrogated his statutory obligations and discarded requests to address the crimes.
2. Judge Roberts was also presented with the details of criminal conduct by President George W. Bush in the cover up of those crimes. In an act of political expediency, Judge Roberts ignored the President's crimes.
3. Furthermore, during March 2005, Judge Roberts was presented with crimes committed by the defense counsel of President Bush in the civil case Anthony P. Keyter vs. President George W. Bush, proceeding in the Court of Appeals, and now in the Supreme Court. [See Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Case Number: 04-5324; Supreme Court Case No 05-140] Acting on the instructions of the President, his defense counsel in this civil suit violated Court of Appeals Court Order No. M-165-88, and criminal statute 18USC§1509. Judge Roberts willfully failed to honor his statutory obligations to address these crimes.
4. Criminal charges have been filed against Judge Roberts with Attorney General Gonzales on August 5, 2005. (A copy of that document is attached herewith, together with delivery confirmation by the Attorney General's office).
These actions of Judge Roberts are thoroughly incompatible with high office. His arbitrary application of the law, his lack of courage in the cause of state, and his lack of strict justice, makes him a questionable arbiter in the perplexity and uncertainty of Supreme Court lawsuits. The willingness of Judge Roberts to violate the criminal statute provides one with some notion of his mind and reveals a timid integrity.
As a Senator of the United States you have no alternative but to reject the nomination of Judge Roberts to the Supreme Court.
Please be so kind as to acknowledge receipt of this letter. For convenience a copy of my letter dated August 5, 2005 is attached hereto.
Sincerely,
Anthony Keyter
Enclosure 2:
Anthony Keyter
[Address]
August 5, 2005
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC. 20510
Dear Senators,
Judicial Record: Supreme Court Nominee - Judge John G. Roberts
On July 19, 2005, Judge John G. Roberts of the United States Court of Appeals was nominated by President George Bush to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. As it is important for Members of Congress to be aware of the Honorable Judge's recent history and judicial record before the Senate confirms this nomination, I herewith provide some little known facts for consideration.
During March 2005, Judge Roberts, acting in the United States Court of Appeals, was presented with a dossier of 1.6 million crimes committed by 230 officials of government, which crimes had neither been investigated nor prosecuted by the authorities. The crimes include: Official Misconduct, Rendering Criminal Assistance, Conspiracy against Rights (18USC§241), Deprivation of Rights under color of law (18USC§242), Tampering with Court Evidence, Perjury, Fraud, and numerous others. However, Judge Roberts has forsaken his statutory obligations and has discarded requests to address the 1.6 million crimes.
On the same day, Judge Roberts was presented with the details of criminal conduct by President George W. Bush in the cover up of those crimes - the President thereby committed numerous counts of obstruction of justice and misprision of felony (18 USC§4), and he became a co-conspirator to the crimes of the officials. The President also failed his statutory obligations and violated numerous laws, including 18USC§535(b). Judge Roberts opportunely paid no attention to allegations of the President's crimes, thereby contravening numerous laws himself.
Furthermore, during March 2005, Judge Roberts was presented with crimes committed by the defense counsel of President Bush in the civil case Anthony P. Keyter vs. President George W. Bush, proceeding in the Court of Appeals. [See United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, case number: 04-5324. This case was filed with the United States Supreme Court on July 21, 2005 - Case number 05-140 - See Addendum 1]. Acting on the instructions of the President, his defense counsel in this civil suit violated Court of Appeals Court Order No. M-165-88 and criminal statute 18USC§1509. President Bush's defense counsel was also acting under severe conflict of interest between their duty to prosecute the President for crimes committed and their duty to defend the President in the civil suit arising from those very same crimes.
Judge Roberts willfully failed to honor his statutory obligations to address the crimes placed before him and in the process violated his oath of office which requires of him to defend the Constitution and uphold the laws. He also failed his mandatory duties in terms of Rule 4 of Federal Rules for Criminal Procedure, and violated numerous statutes, including: 18US§4; 18USC§1505; USC§3; 18USC§371; 28USC§535(b); 18USC§241; 18USC§242; Fourteenth Amendment - United States Constitution; 28USC§453 and 18USC§401 (see Addendum 2). In these violations the Honorable Judge furthered the aims of a conspiracy of some 300 officials of government to commit offence, and by furthering their aims became a co-conspirator to their crimes. In violating the laws Judge Roberts has obstructed the course of justice on 1.6 million counts.
The founding fathers of America have enshrined some noble principles in the Constitution of the United States - principles of freedom, justice, and the protection of individual rights. The raison d'être of the Supreme Court is to defend those principles so eloquently pronounced in the Constitution. The Senate's mandate is to confirm appointments to the Supreme Court of jurists with consummate virtue and sound legal discrimination who can serve that purpose.
However, the actions of Judge Roberts as described above are thoroughly incompatible with that high office. His arbitrary application of the law when it pertains to friends or high officials can be verified by reference to the Court Records in the abovementioned case. Whilst his generous fidelity to friendship may not be questioned here, his courage in the cause of state may well be. His lack of strict justice and his partiality makes him a questionable arbiter in the perplexity and uncertainty of Supreme Court lawsuits. The willingness of Judge Roberts to violate the criminal statute provides one with some notion of his mind and reveals a timid integrity.
Yet President Bush, with full knowledge of his criminal violations, nominated Judge Roberts to carry the flame of justice and to fortify the dignity of the American judicial system in the Supreme Court.
As a Senator of the United States you have no alternative but to reject the nomination of Judge Roberts to the Supreme Court - lest history judge you harshly. Moreover, you have a Congressional duty, in terms of your 'Legislative Jurisdiction over Federal Courts, Judges, and Judicial Proceedings', to ensure that Judge Roberts is brought to book for his corruption, as well as other corrupt officials associated with this case. I entreat you to this stately action.
Please afford me the courtesy of acknowledgment of receipt of this letter, as your name has been forwarded to the public media as a recipient thereof. A copy of this letter, addressed to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, has also been sent to the media. It is indisputably in the public's interest to be aware of these facts. Your actions as a Senator will be monitored across the United States to ascertain whether you will address the crimes of Judge Roberts and others, or whether, like 300 other officials, your rectitude will fail you, and you simply discard your statutory obligations and 1.6 million crimes.
Sincerely,
Anthony Keyter